The Looking Spoon
hellogiggles:

THIS FEMALE POLITICIAN WANTS WOMEN TO MAKE LESS MONEY THAN MEN
by Karen Belz
http://ift.tt/1h71y0h
You can always tell crap analysis when it criticizes an argument and the person who makes it while REFUSING (or simply not having the guts) to LINK. TO. THE. SOURCE!!!
I know why the author of this didn’t do that, if people got a chance to actually read what the other side wrote people would come to the conclusion that her column wouldn’t be worth more than toilet paper if people printed it on paper.
Here… http://www.christianpost.com/news/facts-and-fallacies-about-paycheck-fairness-117959/
You may think what Schlafly says is not politically correct, and it isn’t. But that DOES NOT mean her logic is wrong, much less flawed.
Liberals like Belz think a legitimate counter-point consists of shouting “I DISAGREE (and no you can’t see the original source!)” and calling it a day. In reality it’s a sign of how low the intelligence bar has fallen in public discourse.
By the way…Phyllis Schlafly is not a politician. She has never been elected to anything, ever. If refusing to link to her column wasn’t good enough to do the job, Belz’s ignorance in ascribing a label to Schlafly that she’s never had would be more than enough to impeach her credibility.

hellogiggles:

THIS FEMALE POLITICIAN WANTS WOMEN TO MAKE LESS MONEY THAN MEN

by Karen Belz

http://ift.tt/1h71y0h

You can always tell crap analysis when it criticizes an argument and the person who makes it while REFUSING (or simply not having the guts) to LINK. TO. THE. SOURCE!!!

I know why the author of this didn’t do that, if people got a chance to actually read what the other side wrote people would come to the conclusion that her column wouldn’t be worth more than toilet paper if people printed it on paper.

Here… http://www.christianpost.com/news/facts-and-fallacies-about-paycheck-fairness-117959/

You may think what Schlafly says is not politically correct, and it isn’t. But that DOES NOT mean her logic is wrong, much less flawed.

Liberals like Belz think a legitimate counter-point consists of shouting “I DISAGREE (and no you can’t see the original source!)” and calling it a day. In reality it’s a sign of how low the intelligence bar has fallen in public discourse.

By the way…Phyllis Schlafly is not a politician. She has never been elected to anything, ever. If refusing to link to her column wasn’t good enough to do the job, Belz’s ignorance in ascribing a label to Schlafly that she’s never had would be more than enough to impeach her credibility.

moralanarchism:

Thomas Sowell Dismantles Feminism and Racialism in under 5 Minutes

gilliannigro-editorial:

image

Frankly, I would never trust anyone with such taste in headwear. Try as he might, Matt Drudge, the founder and editor of The Drudge Report, will never be Don Draper.

Yet despite his penchant for linking to false stories, conservative “news” organizations comb through his aggregation…

1. Judging quality by being superficial is exactly the kind of crap that gave us Barack Obama (don’t you leftist fools ever learn?)

2. Drudge broke the Lewinsky story (which was very very true) when alleged “legitimate” news outlets like Newsweek had it before he did and chose to supress it. By your fantasy logic that story would’ve been relegated to mere hoax because….why? Because you’re being told something you don’t want to hear?

3. If Drudge really was wantonly perpetrating “hoax” and obvious inaccuracies as news he would’ve been nailed (and hard) for libel a LOOOOONNNG time ago. 

4. Was the ACORN-assisting-prostitution scandal that Breitbart exposed a hoax too? The MSM tried to report that the first video was an isolated incident, and they continued that idiotic line until half a dozen leaked videos later revealed it wasn’t isolated, or regional, but a national scandal.

Truth IS NOT a measure of your opinion of the messenger. You should do some critical thinking before posting crap analysis like this.

mind-under-matter:

Conservative to unborn fetus: “We must protect you at all costs!”
Conservative as soon as fetus leaves vagina: “lol ur on ur own”

——— uh huh ———

The left has been peddling this idiotic meme for a long time. Have any of the morons who agree with it actually stopped to think about what it actually means?

What does “you’re on your own” mean? What is it that conservatives are supposed to do to prevent this conveniently ambiguous hypocrisy from taking place?

Pro-life conservatives believe every fetus is a life and that life is a right. After it is born the parents of the child have an obligation to raise that child to become a responsible, self-determined, free adult. Are conservatives supposed to step on these parents toes and meddle in the child’s upbringing?

Liberals, think about what you’re actually trying to say before mindlessly repeating hyperbolic, stupid and ignorant memes.

justanotherconservative:

imminentdeathsyndrome:

Did I just fucking hear them say that one of her tests was to pull 105 lbs simulating an injured soldier out of a tank hatch? This is just insanely stupid because an injured solider is going to be dead weight and by no means weighs 105 lbs plus the weight of their gear. Hey, why don’t we just cut corners and lower the requirements to a child’s ability while we’re at it? 
The average weight of a man in the United States is 189 lbs. A soldier’s body armor weighs 30 lbs and their load out is generally around 87 to 127 lbs. Well you might say to just leave the gear behind but you can’t just do that. Try telling your squad leader you left another soldier’s shit behind because you were too weak to carry it. I’m sure they’ll totally understand. 
Doesn’t anybody remember the lies they told about Jessica Lynch being a fucking hero when she wasn’t just so they could paint her up like G.I. Jane? She didn’t even fire one round. Female recruits in the Marines can’t even do 3 pull-ups and they’re lowering the standards for what, some false sense of equality? 

Qualification:  Female Marine recruits have never been required to do 3 pull-ups before.  They have always performed a slightly different exercise known as a flexed arm hang, a strength test that many male Marines who can knock out 20 pull-ups fail to pass when they attempt it.  So as far as the Marines go, the women may actually be able to keep pace, and so long as they can move the kind of weight required for combat, then I don’t care how they test for it.  So long as, yes, the objective integrity of the requirements remains intact.

justanotherconservative:

imminentdeathsyndrome:

Did I just fucking hear them say that one of her tests was to pull 105 lbs simulating an injured soldier out of a tank hatch? This is just insanely stupid because an injured solider is going to be dead weight and by no means weighs 105 lbs plus the weight of their gear. Hey, why don’t we just cut corners and lower the requirements to a child’s ability while we’re at it? 

The average weight of a man in the United States is 189 lbs. A soldier’s body armor weighs 30 lbs and their load out is generally around 87 to 127 lbs. Well you might say to just leave the gear behind but you can’t just do that. Try telling your squad leader you left another soldier’s shit behind because you were too weak to carry it. I’m sure they’ll totally understand. 

Doesn’t anybody remember the lies they told about Jessica Lynch being a fucking hero when she wasn’t just so they could paint her up like G.I. Jane? She didn’t even fire one round. Female recruits in the Marines can’t even do 3 pull-ups and they’re lowering the standards for what, some false sense of equality? 

Qualification:  Female Marine recruits have never been required to do 3 pull-ups before.  They have always performed a slightly different exercise known as a flexed arm hang, a strength test that many male Marines who can knock out 20 pull-ups fail to pass when they attempt it.  So as far as the Marines go, the women may actually be able to keep pace, and so long as they can move the kind of weight required for combat, then I don’t care how they test for it.  So long as, yes, the objective integrity of the requirements remains intact.

bplegacy:

I’m a liberal, and I love Seattle to death, but being in Seattle has made me LESS liberal. If there is one negative aspect about liberals, it is that every single thing offends them. The slightest insensitivity sets them off and everything is offensive. There’s too much political correctness in our society. Yes, it is important to be sensitive, but when we become so overly-sensitive that everything offends us, we just make the issues even worse. 

Yup!!!

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/08/opinion/sunday/conservatives-are-happier-and-extremists-are-happiest-of-all.html?_r=0

image

johnmtg:

I hope you will join me on my new venture as I launch my own political blog! Follow me liberalsforcommonsense.tumblr.com

Fact check: 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/fact-checking-the-2013-state-of-the-union-speech/2013/02/12/ce69a4e0-7589-11e2-95e4-6148e45d7adb_blog.html
http://legalinsurrection.com/2014/04/democratic-campaign-season-built-on-a-100-lie/
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303532704579483752909957472
Thanks for playing, good luck proselytizing ignorance.
stuff-that-irks-me:

Two great Americans and Nick Fury.

stuff-that-irks-me:

Two great Americans and Nick Fury.

ObamaCARE is the LAW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Get over it.
Anonymous

redbloodedamerica:

americas-liberty:

xion1212:

So were slavery ,segregation ,and prohibition . Republicans got rid of them too.

Anon got owned. lol

This should be happening more often, then maybe…just maybe the sycophants will finally realize they’re promoting garbage.

LOL, liberals are so dumb…